TET
Rem OTR NT , lu cin i
DIP Ar PIVILIN ! Pr Gate Peewee |
a se, aX apaRD FOF CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAL, SUITE 1004
TAL
Docket No 6934-14
no Movember 2014
beat
This is in reference to your appl
ant to the provisions
naval record pursu
for correction of your
ication
ef title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
mely manner, the
r application was not filed in a ti
in the interest of justice to waive the statute
consider your application on its merits. A
e Board for Correction of Naval Records,
considered your application on
sitti
19 November 2014. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, 4
copy of which is attached.
Although you
Board found it
of Limitations and
three-member panel of ch
ng in executive session,
ideration of the entire
dence submitted was
obable material
after careful and conscientious cons
the Board Found that the evi
&, £6 establish the existence of pr
In this regard, the Board substantially
contained in the advisory opinion.
n has been denied.
record,
insufficien
error or injus
concurred with t
accordingly, your applicatio
fice.
he comments
f - case are such
he circumstances oO
entitled to have
nnot be taken. y
submission of new and
he date of the Board’s
considered by
e. In this
is regretted that t
Le
that favorable action ca
‘der its decision upon
the Board reconsi
material evidence within one year from t
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously
the Board prior to making its deci
regard, it is important to keep im mind that a presumption ol
11 official records. consequently, when
regularity attaches to a
correction of an official naval record, the
applying for a
ate the existence of
burden is on the applicant to demonstr
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3054 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8666 13
The Board also considered your letters dated 30 July and 15 November 2014, each with enclosures. which after careful and conscientious consideration of the entir the Board found that the evidence submitted was insuff3 establish the existence of probable material error or in this connection, the Board substantially concurre opinion dated 20 August 2014. accordingly: your application has peen denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9395 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. s After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8485 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your prior case, and applicable statutes, regulations and dered the advisory opinions d 9 and 1’ policies. The y 2014 with attachments December 2013 and 10 January 2914, copies of Ww Board also considered your 1etters dated 8 Jul and 8 August 2014. and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ubmitted was ansufficient to a that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3411 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Decket No, NR3411-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ble material error or injustice. year from the date of the Board's decision.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12144 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. RB three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR11423 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 JRE Docket No. Documentery material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...